Every
once in a while, friends and colleagues of mine make something cool. A recent
example that has me excited to teach this fall is Creative Writing in the Digital Age: Theory, Practice, and Pedagogy, compiled and edited by my former
UWM colleagues Michael Dean Clark, Trent Hergenrader and Joseph Rein.
This
coming fall, I am teaching a 200-level Honors course at UWM in Digital Prose,
so this volume came out at the perfect time. Now is the era of multimodality in
writing pedagogy, but most of us are new at the concept. It will continue to be
a slow start, as writing teachers struggle with accommodating students through
this exciting transition, when most of us are still learning what it all means.
I’ve been dabbling with the possibilities that social media has to offer since
my last creative writing course, in which I asked students to build a creative writing journal online. I presented the idea and some of the results at the Mix Digital Conference in 2013, an annual conference in England devoted to digital
writing and pedagogy. But the idea of a digital project might consist of so
many things. Let’s just say there’s a lot I still have to read and learn.
The End of the Physical, Corsham |
Mix Digital Locale in Corsham |
As
a teacher delving into this new territory, particularly valuable in this
collection were the ideas it offered for student projects in digital form. I did
my Mix Digital presentation with Prezi, and I love that program, but struggled
with ways students might use it for their projects. Anna Leahy and Douglas
Dechow’s essay titled “Concentration, Form and Ways of (Digitally) Seeing,”
presented some interesting ways of building student portfolios with Prezi. They
point out that including a week of instruction in which students exchanged
ideas by sharing how they built their portfolios, which is important, because
most students are nearly as green as we are when it comes to using this
technology. What excited me most, given my teaching philosophy, is the way the
Prezi assignment encouraged hyper-awareness of revision.
Trent’s
chapter titled “Game Spaces: Video Games as Story-Generating Systems for
Creative Writers” gave me food for thought in terms of the world-building
possibilities in gaming. (It also does a nice job of breaking down the
assumption that video games make young people unimaginative and stupid.) The
video game presents a great way to think about the way we construct fictional
landscapes and think about how those landscapes affect character decisions.
Since Mix Digital I’ve given a lot of thought to the way digital mapping
programs can offer a lot to creative writers, not to mention student in my
Gender and Migration course. I heart maps.
Mike’s
essay, “The Marketable Creative: Using Technology and Broader Notions of Skill
in the Fiction Course” gave a nice practical rundown of a collaborative fiction
course that echoed a lot of what I learned in teaching English 414: Literary
Journal Production, which puts out the lovely Furrow every spring. (Great new issue by the way…students pulled it
off again!) The digital realm allows for a lot of collaboration that wasn’t as
easily done before. Importantly, Mike points out that collaboration,
communication and professionalization are important extensions of the creative
writing skill-set.
At the Furrow Launch 2015 |
One
aspect of the class in which I assigned the online journal was the notion of
the multiple self: particularly the public self and the private self, and how
the literary self negotiates between them. Joe’s chapter “Lost in Digital
Translation: Navigating the Online Creative Writing Classroom” spoke a lot to
that idea, especially in terms of how you present who you are as the instructor
of a class that does not meet face to face, which might include using video
programs like Camtasia, which I’d never heard of. Janelle Adsit goes into this
even more deeply in “Giving an Account of Oneself: Teaching Identity
Construction and Authorship,” giving ideas for exercises that make students
think about the way identity shifts when we move from one discourse community
to the next, and the way we construct our identity online the way one might
construct a character in a story or a voice in a poem.
Some
of these exercises included a “code-switching exercise” in which she asks
students to write query letters to positions and three very different
publications. Another involved social media: she has students compose
intertextual essays based on what they find in a Google search of themselves,
which makes students think of the character they have created of themselves
through the use of FB and Twitter and so forth. She also assigns a “pastiche
essay” which asks students to record various words and phrases that they speak
or type during the day, and then choose ten phrases that they will link
together either by memory or Googling.
Other
writers in the volume present ideas using digital programs like Inform 7 and Taroko Gorge to create story. Abigail Scheg’s “Reconsidering the
Online Writing Workshop with #25wordstory” was especially interesting to me
because of my interest in flash. #25wordstory invites Twitter users to post
140-character, 25-word stories followed by the hashtag to share throughout
Twitter. In a creative writing class, this represents the opportunity to teach
students (particularly flash students) how to work within constraints and be
economical: to give the right weight to every word and every punctuation mark. At such a short length, every word must have great importance, and word choice
is a tough one for students. Working in a public medium like Twitter also opens
students up to the world of communication and networking, which are important
aspects of the writing life.
Rob
Wittig and Mark Marino’s “Acting Out: Netprov in the Classroom” provides ideas
for creating “netprovs” or “stories creating in existing networked media that
are collaborative and improvised in real time” (153). This chapter goes over
best practices and ideas for using social media and other online forums to
creative collaborative stories. An example included a blog in which all posts
represent patients in a hospital who have lost their hearing and sight. (A
doctor who performs their surgeries and a nurse are also characters.) This gave
me a lot to think about in terms of how I might teach digital storytelling, and
reflected a lot of what I learned from presenters at Mix Digital who practiced
online communal storytelling. (One in particular asked users of the medium to
help him find a woman he described loosely, and to post pictures of her and/or
where she might be.)
Finally,
my friend Christi Clancy writes a chapter titled “The Text is Where It’s At:
Digital Storytelling Assignments that Teach Lessons in Creative Writing” which includes
amazing ideas for using digital formats, especially for creative nonfiction and
memoir. I’ll be teaching a freshman seminar in the fall on identity, and much
of Christi’s ideas could be really useful in that course. (She also gave the
idea of “Radical Revisions” which excites the heck out of me and which I’m
giving a conference presentation on in the fall.)
Some
exercises involved using photos and images. For example, students bring a photo
to class and provide a brief narrative about what’s going on in the photo. The
students swap photos with a partner, who then makes up their own narrative.
Then students write a random noun and adjective on the board, which the
instructor uses to make a Google search for an image. The image is displayed
while the students read their narratives, though the image may have absolutely
nothing to do with the story. Afterwards, they discuss tensions created between
the stories and the images. She also assigns a “pechakucha” in which “participants
display 20 images via PowerPoint and narrate for 20 seconds without notes or text
accompanying the images” (169).
For
the purpose of my freshman seminar on identity though, I liked the idea of the “story
circle,’ that Christi borrows from Beloit’s Center for Digital Storytelling.
Students sit in a circle and a student shares a short anecdote relating to
something they’d like to write about. Then each other student asks a question.
This might be as simple as, what did it
smell like? The idea is that through these discussions, the story is
transformed from a simple anecdote to something more complicated and universal.
Since my seminar will likely involved students writing essays about who they
are, and identity is usually constructed through narrative, I see this as an
ideal activity. Actually, my developmental English students might benefit from
it too.
No comments:
Post a Comment